The multiViewport feature isn't required for GL 4.3, it's required for
GL 4.1. Technically speaking, we could have just dropped it because we
already list the maxViewports requirement. But it seems better to be
very clear here to me.
Fixes: 29f8f21bff ("docs: document zink GL 4.3 requirements")
Acked-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/15300>
We have twice the registers in this case so it makes sense to double
this as well. While this causes slight regressions in shader-db
stats (due to additional register pressure), it helps us hide latency
of memory reads better on 2-thread compiles, where the thread switch
mechanism will be less effective. This shows a ~3% performance
improvement on the UE4 SunTemple demo.
total instructions in shared programs: 12642413 -> 12656164 (0.11%)
instructions in affected programs: 2272652 -> 2286403 (0.61%)
helped: 2924
HURT: 3389
total uniforms in shared programs: 3703861 -> 3704776 (0.02%)
uniforms in affected programs: 213729 -> 214644 (0.43%)
helped: 823
HURT: 1272
total max-temps in shared programs: 2150686 -> 2153505 (0.13%)
max-temps in affected programs: 191332 -> 194151 (1.47%)
helped: 1900
HURT: 1891
total spills in shared programs: 3255 -> 3274 (0.58%)
spills in affected programs: 166 -> 185 (11.45%)
helped: 3
HURT: 6
total fills in shared programs: 4630 -> 4656 (0.56%)
fills in affected programs: 367 -> 393 (7.08%)
helped: 7
HURT: 15
Reviewed-by: Alejandro Piñeiro <apinheiro@igalia.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/15276>
This can add quite a bit of register pressure so it makes sense to disable it
to prevent us from dropping to 2 threads or increase spills:
total instructions in shared programs: 12672813 -> 12642413 (-0.24%)
instructions in affected programs: 256721 -> 226321 (-11.84%)
helped: 719
HURT: 77
total threads in shared programs: 415534 -> 416322 (0.19%)
threads in affected programs: 788 -> 1576 (100.00%)
helped: 394
HURT: 0
total uniforms in shared programs: 3711370 -> 3703861 (-0.20%)
uniforms in affected programs: 28859 -> 21350 (-26.02%)
helped: 204
HURT: 455
total max-temps in shared programs: 2159439 -> 2150686 (-0.41%)
max-temps in affected programs: 32945 -> 24192 (-26.57%)
helped: 585
HURT: 47
total spills in shared programs: 5966 -> 3255 (-45.44%)
spills in affected programs: 2933 -> 222 (-92.43%)
helped: 192
HURT: 4
total fills in shared programs: 9328 -> 4630 (-50.36%)
fills in affected programs: 5184 -> 486 (-90.62%)
helped: 196
HURT: 0
Compared to the stats before adding scheduling of non-filtered
memory reads we see we that we have now gotten back all that was
lost and then some:
total instructions in shared programs: 12663186 -> 12642413 (-0.16%)
instructions in affected programs: 2051803 -> 2031030 (-1.01%)
helped: 4885
HURT: 3338
total threads in shared programs: 415870 -> 416322 (0.11%)
threads in affected programs: 896 -> 1348 (50.45%)
helped: 300
HURT: 74
total uniforms in shared programs: 3711629 -> 3703861 (-0.21%)
uniforms in affected programs: 158766 -> 150998 (-4.89%)
helped: 1973
HURT: 499
total max-temps in shared programs: 2138857 -> 2150686 (0.55%)
max-temps in affected programs: 177920 -> 189749 (6.65%)
helped: 2666
HURT: 2035
total spills in shared programs: 3860 -> 3255 (-15.67%)
spills in affected programs: 2653 -> 2048 (-22.80%)
helped: 77
HURT: 21
total fills in shared programs: 5573 -> 4630 (-16.92%)
fills in affected programs: 3839 -> 2896 (-24.56%)
helped: 81
HURT: 15
total sfu-stalls in shared programs: 39583 -> 38154 (-3.61%)
sfu-stalls in affected programs: 8993 -> 7564 (-15.89%)
helped: 1808
HURT: 1038
total nops in shared programs: 324894 -> 323685 (-0.37%)
nops in affected programs: 30362 -> 29153 (-3.98%)
helped: 2513
HURT: 2077
Reviewed-by: Alejandro Piñeiro <apinheiro@igalia.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/15276>
We do a few changes over NIR's defaults:
1. Lower delay for texture reads. Empirically, we don't observe any
benefits with delays over 50 and since this delay value is still
used by the scheduler in the "favor register pressure" case it is
benefitial to avoid overestimating it too much.
2. Adjust delay for non-filtered TMU reads to the delay selected for
texture reads.
3. In our case, UBO reads from dynamically uniform addresses don't
use the TMU and have a latency of 1 instruction in the best case
scenario or 4 at worse, so we go with 1 so we don't try to move
this early.
This helps us get back some of what we lost when updating the
default scheduler configuration to add a delay for non-filtered
memory reads:
total instructions in shared programs: 13126587 -> 12671765 (-3.46%)
instructions in affected programs: 3764097 -> 3309275 (-12.08%)
helped: 14664
HURT: 4244
total threads in shared programs: 407208 -> 415522 (2.04%)
threads in affected programs: 8716 -> 17030 (95.39%)
helped: 4224
HURT: 67
total uniforms in shared programs: 3812698 -> 3711224 (-2.66%)
uniforms in affected programs: 335170 -> 233696 (-30.28%)
helped: 2816
HURT: 3551
total max-temps in shared programs: 2318430 -> 2159345 (-6.86%)
max-temps in affected programs: 539991 -> 380906 (-29.46%)
helped: 13173
HURT: 1440
total spills in shared programs: 49086 -> 5966 (-87.85%)
spills in affected programs: 48306 -> 5186 (-89.26%)
helped: 1655
HURT: 28
total fills in shared programs: 55810 -> 9328 (-83.29%)
fills in affected programs: 54821 -> 8339 (-84.79%)
helped: 1659
HURT: 22
LOST: 0
GAINED: 3
Reviewed-by: Alejandro Piñeiro <apinheiro@igalia.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/15276>
On V3D reading UBOs from uniform addresses uses a more efficient
mechanism with lower latency. On other platforms there may be
simular scenarios.
Reviewed-by: Alejandro Piñeiro <apinheiro@igalia.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/15276>
This has been pending for a long time. It is not very consistent to
add a significant delay for textures and not do it for UBOs, etc
The reason we have not been doing this so far is the accumulated effect
on register pressure for V3D as shown by shader-db results below, but
from the point of view of a generic scheduler it makes sense to do this.
Later patches will address V3D specific issues with register pressure
derived from this by letting the driver control its instruction delay
settings.
total instructions in shared programs: 12662138 -> 13126587 (3.67%)
instructions in affected programs: 1813091 -> 2277540 (25.62%)
helped: 2410
HURT: 10499
total threads in shared programs: 415858 -> 407208 (-2.08%)
threads in affected programs: 17348 -> 8698 (-49.86%)
helped: 8
HURT: 4333
total uniforms in shared programs: 3711483 -> 3812698 (2.73%)
uniforms in affected programs: 128012 -> 229227 (79.07%)
helped: 3474
HURT: 2143
total max-temps in shared programs: 2138763 -> 2318430 (8.40%)
max-temps in affected programs: 318780 -> 498447 (56.36%)
helped: 588
HURT: 11997
total spills in shared programs: 3860 -> 49086 (1171.66%)
spills in affected programs: 709 -> 45935 (6378.84%)
helped: 23
HURT: 1595
total fills in shared programs: 5573 -> 55810 (901.44%)
fills in affected programs: 1067 -> 51304 (4708.25%)
helped: 23
HURT: 1595
LOST: 3
GAINED: 0
Reviewed-by: Alejandro Piñeiro <apinheiro@igalia.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/15276>
We can get a generic nir_intrinsic_memory_barrier to represent a
barrier involving multiple semantics (instead of getting individual
specific barriers for each semantic). This means that we need to
consider these as potentially affecting shared memory access as well.
Reviewed-by: Alejandro Piñeiro <apinheiro@igalia.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/15276>
This doesn't have any significant impact shader-db stats and would
reduce our capacity to hide latency from the loads, so it is probably
undesirable:
total instructions in shared programs: 12663189 -> 12663186 (<.01%)
instructions in affected programs: 4222 -> 4219 (-0.07%)
helped: 9
HURT: 4
total uniforms in shared programs: 3711624 -> 3711629 (<.01%)
uniforms in affected programs: 186 -> 191 (2.69%)
helped: 0
HURT: 2
total max-temps in shared programs: 2138822 -> 2138857 (<.01%)
max-temps in affected programs: 569 -> 604 (6.15%)
helped: 1
HURT: 9
Reviewed-by: Alejandro Piñeiro <apinheiro@igalia.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/15276>
These formats are used by the piglit
arb_texture_buffer_object-formats fs arb
Adding them here keeps the piglit from crashing, but most of the related
tests don't pass.
Signed-off-by: Gert Wollny <gert.wollny@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Corentin Noël <corentin.noel@collabora.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/13645>
On Icelake and later, we can use a new 3DSTATE_BINDING_TABLE_POOL_ALLOC
command to update the location of the binder (buffer containing binding
table entries), rather than having to move Surface State Base Address
via a STATE_BASE_ADDRESS command. This has less stalling and also means
our surface addresses can remain relative to a fixed 4GB address range,
meaning we don't have to re-stream them any time the binder changes.
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/14507>
This workaround is needed on all Gfx12.0 parts, but doesn't appear to be
necessary on XeHP. The other drivers do not appear to be applying this
workaround on those parts. As further evidence, we accidentally added
the 3DSTATE_BINDING_TABLE_POOL_ALLOC commands after switching back to
GPGPU mode, which would be an incorrect way to implement the workaround,
and things seem to be working.
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/14507>
On Gfx11+, we're going to stop changing Surface State Base Address
and instead start changing the Binding Table Pool address instead.
So, rename a few things to track the last binder address, which is
what we're actually changing, regardless of how we program it.
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/14507>
Skylake and older use a 15:5 binding table pointer format, which means
our binder can be at most 64kB in size. Each binding table within the
binder must be aligned to 32B.
XeHP uses a new 20:5 binding table format, which allows us to increase
the binder size to 1MB while retaining the nice 32B alignment. Larger
binders mean fewer stalls as we update the base address for the binder.
Icelake and Tigerlake can either use the 15:5 format or an 18:8 format.
18:8 mode requires the base of each binding table to be aligned to 256B
instead of 32B, but it gives us a maximum binder size of 512kB.
We can store 64 binding table entries in a 256B chunk (256B / 4B = 64),
but only 8 entries in a 32B chunk (32B / 4B = 8). Assuming that most
binding tables have fewer than 64 entries, this means that with the 18:8
format, we're likely to be able to fit 2048 (512KB / 256B) tables into a
a buffer before needing to allocate a new one and stall.
Technically, the old format could also store 2048 binding tables per
buffer as well (64KB / 32B = 2048). However, tables that needed more
than 8 entries would need multiple 32B chunks. A single table would
take multiple aligned chunks, while with the larger 256B format, it
could fit in a single one.
This cuts binder resets by 6.3% on a Shadow of Mordor benchmark trace.
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/14507>
On Gen11+, we have a feature that requires us to shift binding table
offsets by 3. This adds a helper which gives the driver a hook to do
this if it so chooses.
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/14507>
Otherwise this causes trouble with unitialized memory, eg with:
struct si_transfer {
struct threaded_transfer b;
struct si_resource *staging;
};
'staging' will not be initialized and this causes #6109.
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/6109
Cc: mesa-stable
Acked-By: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@gmail.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/15298>
A a variant that clears the allocated object to 0.
Cc: mesa-stable
Acked-By: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@gmail.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/15298>
So we can easily add entries after the standard varyings/attributes
(like image descriptors in the attribute array).
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason.ekstrand@collabora.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/15248>
The idea of storing offsets in a separate UBO and lowering accesses to
UBOs/SSBOs with a dynamic offset was not great. Let's apply the offset
at UBO/SSBO emission time instead.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason.ekstrand@collabora.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/15248>
this comes in two flavors:
* streamout of array<struct/block>
* partial streamout of array/struct/block
for the former:
* arrays of structs can just be blasted out in the initial var declaration (easy)
* arrays of blocks must be output to separate xfb buffers for each array block,
which requires skipping initial xfb blast-off and instead propagating the values
using tmp variables at a later point
for the latter:
* the optimal way to do this is to unwrap the struct first to figure out what's being
emitted, at which point the value can be extracted and exported
fixes the rest of spec@arb_gl_spirv@execution@xfb
...except spec@arb_gl_spirv@execution@xfb@vs_block_array, which I'm suspecting is broken
due to vtn bugs
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/15224>
this now handles inlining of stupid types (dvec3, dmatX) and complex
types (goku) as seen in cts
fixes:
KHR-Single-GL46.enhanced_layouts.xfb_explicit_location
KHR-Single-GL46.enhanced_layouts.xfb_struct_explicit_location
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/15224>