Note: the default value for EmitCondCodes is FALSE. This means the GLSL
compiler will emit code like this:
SEQ TEMP[0].x, A, B;
IF TEMP[0].x;
...
ENDIF
But if EmitCondCodes is TRUE, condition codes will be used instead:
SEQ.C TEMP[0].x, A, B;
IF (NE.xxxx);
...
ENDIF
The default for EmitCondCodes got flipped when gallium-0.2 was merged.
This fixes GLSL if/else/endif regressions.
Drivers that use GLSL should always explicitly set the flag to be safe.
R3xx/R5xx fragment program texture constants must come from a hardware
register instead of the constant file, so we redirect if necessary during
the native rewrite phase.
The symptoms of this bug started appearing when the Mesa fixed function
texenvprogram code started using STATE_CURRENT_ATTRIB constants for
texture coordinates when the corresponding attributes were constant across
all vertices.
Signed-off-by: Nicolai Haehnle <nhaehnle@gmail.com>
This cleans up some of the cruft from the old DRI setup, and
it turns out that only the GLSL extensions are still off if we
let st_extensions.c handle the setup instead.
Previously, the prog_instruction::Data field was used to map original Mesa
instructions to brw instructions in order to resolve subroutine calls. This
was a rather tangled mess. Plus it's an obstacle to implementing dynamic
allocation/growing of the instruction buffer (it's still a fixed size).
Mesa's GLSL compiler emits a label for each subroutine and CAL instruction.
Now we use those labels to patch the subroutine calls after code generation
has been done. We just keep a list of all CAL instructions that needs patching
and a list of all subroutine labels. It's a simple matter to resolve them.
This also consolidates some redundant post-emit code between brw_vs_emit.c and
brw_wm_glsl.c and removes some loops that cleared the prog_instruction::Data
fields at the end.
Plus, a bunch of new comments.
I'm committing this because it fixes a conform failure; the failure occurs
on the TextureProxy test, where the test attempts to create proxy textures
at every level, but fails at the last level (border == 1, width == 1,
height == 1) because it's beyond MAX_TEXTURE_LEVELS.
Eric's original comment was:
idr said that in his review swrast was ready for it, and the 965 driver is
advertising it already though it has been resulting in many crashes due to
arrays using these defines not being big enough.