I think we want to cover these 3 generations at the barely minimum.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <mdaenzer@redhat.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4082>
These are pretty straightforward but there's a lot of details to keep
straight. In the IR, we keep a general logical comparator and types
separately; in the hardware, the type gets fused with a (much more)
limited number of comparators. So there's a fair bit of code here to
account for these differences, fusing in the type information, and
changing up argument order as necessary to make it actually correct.
Anything to save a bit!
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com>
Tested-by: Marge Bot <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4276>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4276>
This way we always have regular csel conditions instead of a weird
.always special case for 3-src CSEL mode.
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4276>
This gets us part of the way there to packing lo/hi separately. A little
more work is needed to do this "properly", but hey.
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4276>
When generating csel instructions, we can peak to see what condition is
being used. If we're using a "nice" condition, we can fuse it in with
the csel itself, ideally letting the condition itself be DCE'd away.
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4276>
We would like to use this routine opportunistically when fusing
conditions into csels and branches, so let's add a mode where we don't
abort.
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4276>
We need to make the semantics of BI_VECTOR a bit more precise -
vectorize only the first argument, not all of them. This is enough for
current and future users, as far as I know.
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4276>
We rewrite BIR_INDEX_CONSTANT (and _ZERO) to preassigned constant ports
when assign uniform_const for the bundle. There are a lot of issues
raised here, unfortunately, and the implementation here is woefully
incomplete with a nasty hack for loads... nevertheless, it's somewhere
to start.
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4276>
We're not totally sure what's up with this but Connor says if you
violate it Bad Things happen in your shader. I think this might be an
issue affecting early Bifrost (G71, ..?); when we know more we can look
into patching in a fix.
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4276>
We need ALU mostly scalarized, but we get vector moves created from
lower_vec_to_mov so let's scalarize that ourselves rather than bother
NIR.
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4276>
We split off MOV from FMOV since the canonical move on Bifrost doesn't
accept modifiers. (We can still do fmov, but with something like add-0.)
This will also make copyprop a little nicer, I think. Anyway, the
non-modifier version we can implement as-is for FMA.
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4276>
This reworks the data structure a bit and, in my view, simplifies it.
Instead of each node having a header which has the node level in it, we
use the bottom 6 bits of the pointer for that. This requires us to
allocate with the os_malloc/free_aligned helpers (which call into
posix_memalign on Linux) but cache-line aligning our allocations is
actually probably a good thing given that we're doing atomics on them.
The primary advantages to doing this is that it changes the number of
memory accesses per tree level from 2 to 1 when walking the tree because
we no longer have to look at node->level.
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Tested-by: Marge Bot <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4228>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4228>
As soon as I switch to using the allocation helpers in os_memory.h,
these tests start blowing up on the Windows build in GitLab CI. As far
as I can tell, the issue is something with the combination of the debug
allocator in u_debug_memory.c and the mutex implementation in the
version of Wine running in CI. The tests don't fail on real windows nor
do they fail with newer versions of Wine.
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4228>
Samuel Pitoiset
Jan Zielinski
Eric Anholt
Dave Airlie
Jordan Justen
Alyssa Rosenzweig
Jonathan Marek
Marek Olšák
Eduardo Lima Mitev
Jason Ekstrand