These will be useful for sparse texture instructions and image load
intrinsics.
Signed-off-by: Rhys Perry <pendingchaos02@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/7774>
We're about to introduce conversion ops which are going to want two
different types. We may as well just split the one we have rather than
end up with three. There are a couple places where this is mildly
inconvenient but most of the time I find it to actually be nicer.
Reviewed-by: Jesse Natalie <jenatali@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/6945>
Consts and undefs can be used as different types (common with "0" constant)
so don't copy types from consts/undefs, only to them. It doesn't entirely
solve the problem that the type given to the const could be wrong , but
now the only realistic case is with "0" which is the same when casted to
float, so it doesn't matter for lower_int_to_float.
The other change is to get type information for load input/uniform and
store output, and use that to get correct results.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Marek <jonathan@marek.ca>
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
The difference between imov and fmov has been a constant source of
confusion in NIR for years. No one really knows why we have two or when
to use one vs. the other. The real reason is that they do different
things in the presence of source and destination modifiers. However,
without modifiers (which many back-ends don't have), they are identical.
Now that we've reworked nir_lower_to_source_mods to leave one abs/neg
instruction in place rather than replacing them with imov or fmov
instructions, we don't need two different instructions at all anymore.
Reviewed-by: Kristian H. Kristensen <hoegsberg@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>
Reviewed-by: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
This new pass (which isn't even compile-tested) attempts to determine
the ALU type of all the SSA values in a function impl. It takes a
greedy approach and assigns intness or floatness to everything it thinks
can possibly contain an int or a float. Some values will be labled as
both int and float and some will be labled as neither and it is up to
the caller to decide what to do with this information. However, for a
"nice" shader where the original source contained no bit-casts and no
implicit bit-casts were introduced by optimizations, there shouldn't be
any overlap in the two sets save for the odd CSEd zero constant.
Reviewed-by: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@gmail.com>
Eric Anholt
Rhys Perry
Jason Ekstrand
Jonathan Marek