GL by default gives you UB when you access a missing constbuf, and we were
crashing on debug builds in that case. More importantly, we were
assertion failing even under valid circumstances, when a !ExecMask channel
had a bad value for the indirect buffer index and we tried to load from it
anyway.
In removing the assertion, also sink the buf declaration to after we've
done the bounds check that determines that there's a constbuf actually
bound to this index.
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák <marek.olsak@amd.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/8196>
We need to pick 1u vs 1.0f based on the type of the texture, just like for
normal samples. Move the decision up to the create_sampler_view, and use
that value from both sampler paths.
Cc: mesa-stable
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/8012>
Fixes the rasterizer_discard failures for softpipe, because the wide paths
(which we hit for points in the CTS) were dropping the discard state when
making the no_cull shadow state.
Cc: mesa-stable
Reviewed-by: Brian Paul <brianp@vmware.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/7558>
I found the C++ runner hard to develop on, and we had stability issues and
outstanding feature needs that made me want something I felt good about
hacking on. Thus, Rewrite It In Rust of the deqp runner.
The new runner includes:
- Skip lists don't reshuffle the test list.
- Known-flake handling without resorting to skip lists (fixing our main CI
reliability issue on a3xx right now).
- Per-thread Vulkan shader caches should speed up VK CI runtime.
- Tracking of crashes separate from fails (so we can see progress on that
front).
- Logging of deqp stderr spam (particularly assertion failures!) in the CI
log.
- Integrated QPA filtering so we don't have bash perf issues for it.
- Logging of what caselist to go look at for a given error report (in red,
so it's easier to find in your CI log).
- The code is 1/3 unit tests, and easy to extend for more coverage.
- Non-LAVA CI runs create a failures.csv in artifacts that you can check
in as your deqp-*-fails.txt file.
- Test runtime is included in results.csv so you can debug how to speed up
your CI job.
- Pretty summary at the end of the run of slow/flaky/failed tests.
Since this is a new runner with a different RNG, the test groups are
shuffled one more time. This seems to result in some panfrost T720
stability issues (See its new deqp-panfrost-t720-flakes.txt), and one new
flake in freedreno a630.
Reviewed-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/7434>
There's no need to have separate build scripts here, just choose what the
DEQP_TARGET is for the particular container being built. This brings in a
tremendous number of GLES test fixes that haven't made it into a tagged
gles CTS release.
Closes: #2056
Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/6526>
I've been hacking on softpipe in the process of trying to delete a bunch
of core Mesa code, and want to make sure I don't regress desktop GL
either. The run takes under a minute and a half.
Reviewed-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/6466>
Now that we're not using so many job slots, it's easy to get these
jobs run in a reasonable amount of time (gles3 took 10 minutes for 4
cores, and gles31 was 15 minutes for 4 cores).
Acked-by: Michel Dänzer <mdaenzer@redhat.com>
The GLES2 CTS takes about 8 minutes of total runtime (at parallel 4 is
~2 minutes in the test stage if runners are free), while GLES3 takes
about 25. Since the GLES3 run is pretty expensive, just do a cheap
touch test of 1 out of every 10 tests in the test list on MRs, until
we can get the runtime down.
v2: Drop the full run for now until we can bring runtime down or bring
up a dedicated mesa runner.
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric@engestrom.ch> (v1)
Reviewed-By: Gert Wollny <gert.wollny@collabora.com> (v1)