It's easy to get something wrong in the driver build or container or
something that results in falling back to swrast, and then your only clue
was runtime and how your failure cases suspiciously match a swrast
driver's.
Reviewed-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4621>
We always want to see status updates happening in the logs, otherwise it
can like maybe your machine hung until the run actually completes.
Reviewed-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4621>
There's some files from the .gitlab-ci directory that are needed in the
test stage and that, because the Mesa repository isn't checked out in
that stage, need to be made available through other means.
Because those files are going to be needed in LAVA devices, place them
ino the tarball containing the built files so it's available to both
gitlab-ci runners and LAVA devices.
Before those files were passed in the artifacts of the Gitlab CI job,
but this commit places them into the built tarball so scripts later in
the pipeline don't need to account for this discrepancy.
Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4295>
Following on from the db410c conversion to baremetal testing, reuse the
same scripts in the same rack to run 7 db820c boards (#4/8 is failing in
the bootloader for unknown reasons).
Reviewed-by: Kristian H. Kristensen <hoegsberg@google.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4177>
This supports powering up the device (using an external tool you
provide based on your particular lab), talking over serial to wait for
the fastboot prompt, and then booting a fastboot image on a target
device.
I was previously relying on LAVA for this, but that ran afoul of
corporate policies related to the AGPL. However, LAVA wasn't doing
too much for us, given that gitlab already has a job scheduler and
tagging and runners. We were spending a lot of engineering on making
the two systems match up, when we can just have gitlab do it directly.
Lightly-reviewed-by: Kristian H. Kristensen <hoegsberg@google.com>
Tested-by: Marge Bot <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4076>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4076>
Eric Anholt
Tomeu Vizoso