When the EU validator encountered an error, it would add an annotation
to the disassembly. Unfortunately, the code to insert an error assumed
that the next instruction would start at (offset + sizeof(brw_inst)),
which is not true if the instruction with an error is compacted.
This could lead to cascading disassembly errors, where we started trying
to decode the next instruction at the wrong offset, and getting lots of
scary looking output:
ERROR: Register Regioning patterns where [...]
(-f0.1.any16h) illegal(*** invalid execution size value 6 ) { align1 $7.src atomic };
(+f0.1.any16h) illegal.sat(*** invalid execution size value 6 ) { align1 $9.src AccWrEnable };
illegal(*** invalid execution size value 6 ) { align1 $11.src };
(+f0.1) illegal.sat(*** invalid execution size value 6 ) { align1 F@2 AccWrEnable };
(+f0.1) illegal.sat(*** invalid execution size value 6 ) { align1 F@2 AccWrEnable };
(+f0.1) illegal.sat(*** invalid execution size value 6 ) { align1 $15.src AccWrEnable };
illegal(*** invalid execution size value 6 ) { align1 $15.src };
(+f0.1) illegal.sat.g.f0.1(*** invalid execution size value 6 ) { align1 $13.src AccWrEnable };
Only the first instruction was actually wrong - the rest are just a
result of starting the disassembler at the wrong offset. Trash ensues!
To fix this, just pass the instruction size in a few layers so we can
record the next offset properly.
Cc: mesa-stable
Reviewed-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/17624>
This structure will contain the opcode mapping tables in the next
commit. For now, this is the mechanical change to plumb it into all
the necessary places, and it continues simply holding devinfo.
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/17309>
Ensure that all resources are properly released by
properly parenting them to a memory context and releasing
the context during test teardown.
Signed-off-by: Rohan Garg <rohan.garg@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Tapani Pälli <tapani.palli@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/8162>
With discrete GPUs, it's going to be possible to have GPUs from two
different hardware generations in the machine at the same time. Global
singletons like this aren't going to fly. Have a struct containing the
pointers which gets initialized once per shader disassemble instead.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/6244>
Shader instructions which use UIP/JIP now get formatted with a label
in addition with immediate value, labels have "LABEL%d" format.
v2: - Consider brw_jump_scale when calculating label's offset
From: "Lonnberg, Toni" <toni.lonnberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Danylo Piliaiev <danylo.piliaiev@globallogic.com>
Reviewed-by: Sagar Ghuge <sagar.ghuge@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4245>
Two of the tests emit instructions with MRF destinations, and MRFs
aren't present on Gen7+. I think we were just lucky that this didn't
cause a problem earlier since we were running the tests on Gen7-9.
Reviewed-by: Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho <caio.oliveira@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/merge_requests/2635>
Change brw_inst_set_opcode() and brw_inst_opcode() to call
brw_opcode_encode/decode() transparently in order to translate between
hardware and IR opcodes, and update the EU compaction code in order to
do the same as needed, so we can eventually drop the one-to-one
correspondence between hardware and IR opcodes.
Reviewed-by: Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho <caio.oliveira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Reviewed-by: Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho <caio.oliveira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
test_fuzz_compact_instruction() was attempting to modify the uint64_t
data array of a brw_inst through a pointer to uint32_t, which has
undefined behavior. This was causing the test_eu_compact unit test to
fail mysteriously for me on GCC 7 with some additional
harmless-looking changes I had applied to my tree, which happened to
affect the order instructions are emitted by GCC causing the bit
twiddling to be done after the clear_pad_bits() call which is supposed
to overwrite the same data through a pointer of different type,
leading to data corruption. A similar failure has been reported by
Vinson Lee on the master branch built with GCC 8.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105052
Tested-by: Vinson Lee <vlee@freedesktop.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Note that there's no point in testing on G45, since its compaction is
the same as Gen5. Same logic applies to Gen7 variants and low-power
parts.
Reviewed-by: Scott D Phillips <scott.d.phillips@intel.com>
At the moment all the tests but test_eu_compact are actual C++ gtests.
To simplify things, we can move the gtest.la to the common TEST_LIBS.
As we're here, we can rename change the test extension [to .cpp] to
avoid using the confusing dummy.cpp.
Add a nice comment in the makefile for posterity.
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
2017-03-13 11:16:35 +00:00
Renamed from src/intel/compiler/test_eu_compact.c (Browse further)
Kenneth Graunke
Lionel Landwerlin
Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho
Anuj Phogat
Jordan Justen
Rohan Garg
Ian Romanick
Jason Ekstrand
Danylo Piliaiev
Matt Turner
Francisco Jerez
Emil Velikov