Recently, we started using <1;1,0> register regions for consecutive
channels, rather than the <8;8,1> we've traditionally used, as the
<1;1,0> encoding can be compacted on XeHP. Since then, one of the
EU validator rules has been flagging tons of instructions as errors:
mov(16) g114<1>F g112<1,1,0>UD { align1 1H I@2 compacted };
ERROR: Register Regioning patterns where register data bit locations are changed between source and destination are not supported except for broadcast of a scalar.
Our code for this restriction checked three things:
#1: vstride != width * hstride ||
#2: src_stride != dst_stride ||
#3: subreg != dst_subreg
Destination regions are always linear (no replicated values, nor
any overlapping components), as they only have hstride. Rule #1 is
requiring that the source region be linear as well. Rules #2-3 are
straightforward: the subregister must match (for the first channel to
line up), and the source/destination strides must match (for any
subsequent channels to line up).
Unfortunately, rules #1-2 weren't working when horizontal stride was 0.
In that case, regions are linear if width == 1, and the stride between
consecutive channels is given by vertical stride instead.
So we adjust our src_stride calculation from
src_stride = hstride * type_size;
to:
src_stride = (hstride ? hstride : vstride) * type_size;
and adjust rule #1 to allow hstride == 0 as long as width == 1.
While here, we also update the text of the rule to match the latest
documentation, which apparently clarifies that it's the location of
the LSB of the channel which matters.
Fixes: 3f50dde8b3 ("intel/eu: Teach EU validator about FP/DP pipeline regioning restrictions.")
Reviewed-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/17624>
When the EU validator encountered an error, it would add an annotation
to the disassembly. Unfortunately, the code to insert an error assumed
that the next instruction would start at (offset + sizeof(brw_inst)),
which is not true if the instruction with an error is compacted.
This could lead to cascading disassembly errors, where we started trying
to decode the next instruction at the wrong offset, and getting lots of
scary looking output:
ERROR: Register Regioning patterns where [...]
(-f0.1.any16h) illegal(*** invalid execution size value 6 ) { align1 $7.src atomic };
(+f0.1.any16h) illegal.sat(*** invalid execution size value 6 ) { align1 $9.src AccWrEnable };
illegal(*** invalid execution size value 6 ) { align1 $11.src };
(+f0.1) illegal.sat(*** invalid execution size value 6 ) { align1 F@2 AccWrEnable };
(+f0.1) illegal.sat(*** invalid execution size value 6 ) { align1 F@2 AccWrEnable };
(+f0.1) illegal.sat(*** invalid execution size value 6 ) { align1 $15.src AccWrEnable };
illegal(*** invalid execution size value 6 ) { align1 $15.src };
(+f0.1) illegal.sat.g.f0.1(*** invalid execution size value 6 ) { align1 $13.src AccWrEnable };
Only the first instruction was actually wrong - the rest are just a
result of starting the disassembler at the wrong offset. Trash ensues!
To fix this, just pass the instruction size in a few layers so we can
record the next offset properly.
Cc: mesa-stable
Reviewed-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/17624>
If these checks had been in place previously, some bugs
that... eh-hem... practically took down the Intel CI would have been
caught earlier. *blush*
v2: Update to account for split sends.
v3: Add some more Gfx version checks. Remove the redundant "src0 is a
GRF" check. Both suggested by Ken.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/17379>
This structure will contain the opcode mapping tables in the next
commit. For now, this is the mechanical change to plumb it into all
the necessary places, and it continues simply holding devinfo.
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/17309>
v2: Very significant rebase on changes to previous commits.
Specifically, brw_fs_nir.cpp changes were pretty much rewritten from
scratch after changing the NIR opcode names and types.
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/12142>
These checks were originally assertions elsewhere either in the existing
code or later in this MR.
Suggested-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/9027>
This moves the fi_types to a new mesa_private.h and removes the
imports.c file. The vast majority of this patch is just removing
pound includes of imports.h and fixing up the recursive includes.
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák <marek.olsak@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Kristian H. Kristensen <hoegsberg@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/3024>
Otherwise, the validator tries to read the type of src1 of a SEND/SENDS
which doesn't actually have a type field. This prevents validation
issues in the next commit.
Reviewed-by: Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho <caio.oliveira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/merge_requests/3642>
Specifically, execution size, register file, and register type. I did
not add validation for vertical stride and width because I don't believe
it's possible to have an otherwise valid instruction with an invalid
vertical stride or width, due to all of the other regioning
restrictions.
Reviewed-by: Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho <caio.oliveira@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/merge_requests/2635>
In order to fuzz test instructions, we first need to do some sanity
checking first. Factoring out this function allows us an easy way to
validate a single instruction.
Reviewed-by: Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho <caio.oliveira@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/merge_requests/2635>
To avoid it, use the modulo of the number of bits in the value being
shifted, which is presumably what ended up happening on x86.
Flagged by UBSan:
../src/intel/compiler/brw_eu_validate.c:974:33: runtime error: shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'long unsigned int'
#0 0x561abb612ab3 in general_restrictions_on_region_parameters ../src/intel/compiler/brw_eu_validate.c:974
#1 0x561abb617574 in brw_validate_instructions ../src/intel/compiler/brw_eu_validate.c:1851
#2 0x561abb53bd31 in validate ../src/intel/compiler/test_eu_validate.cpp:106
#3 0x561abb555369 in validation_test_source_cannot_span_more_than_2_registers_Test::TestBody() ../src/intel/compiler/test_eu_validate.cpp:486
#4 0x561abb742651 in void testing::internal::HandleSehExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void>(testing::Test*, void (testing::Test::*)(), char const*) ../src/gtest/src/gtest.cc:2402
#5 0x561abb72e64d in void testing::internal::HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void>(testing::Test*, void (testing::Test::*)(), char const*) ../src/gtest/src/gtest.cc:2438
#6 0x561abb6d5451 in testing::Test::Run() ../src/gtest/src/gtest.cc:2474
#7 0x561abb6d7b2a in testing::TestInfo::Run() ../src/gtest/src/gtest.cc:2656
#8 0x561abb6da2b8 in testing::TestCase::Run() ../src/gtest/src/gtest.cc:2774
#9 0x561abb6f5c92 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() ../src/gtest/src/gtest.cc:4649
#10 0x561abb74626a in bool testing::internal::HandleSehExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool>(testing::internal::UnitTestImpl*, bool (testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::*)(), char const*) ../src/gtest/src/gtest.cc:2402
#11 0x561abb732025 in bool testing::internal::HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::internal::UnitTestImpl, bool>(testing::internal::UnitTestImpl*, bool (testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::*)(), char const*) ../src/gtest/src/gtest.cc:2438
#12 0x561abb6ed2b4 in testing::UnitTest::Run() ../src/gtest/src/gtest.cc:4257
#13 0x561abb768b3b in RUN_ALL_TESTS() ../src/gtest/include/gtest/gtest.h:2233
#14 0x561abb7689fb in main ../src/gtest/src/gtest_main.cc:37
#15 0x7f525e5a9bba in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308
#16 0x561abb538ed9 in _start (/home/daenzer/src/mesa-git/mesa/build-amd64-sanitize/src/intel/compiler/eu_validate+0x1b8ed9)
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
They look like a NULL source if you don't look at the address mode.
Reviewed-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
The following fix-up by Jordan Justen is squashed in:
intel/eu/validate: gen12 send instruction doesn't have a dst type field
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
src0 will typically be null for this instruction.
Reviewed-by: Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho <caio.oliveira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Change brw_inst_set_opcode() and brw_inst_opcode() to call
brw_opcode_encode/decode() transparently in order to translate between
hardware and IR opcodes, and update the EU compaction code in order to
do the same as needed, so we can eventually drop the one-to-one
correspondence between hardware and IR opcodes.
Reviewed-by: Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho <caio.oliveira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
The brw_inst opcode accessors are going away in one of the following
commits. We could potentially replace them with the new helpers that
do opcode remapping, but that would lead to a circular dependency
between brw_inst.h and brw_eu.h. This way we also avoid ordering
issues that can cause the semantics of the ex_desc accessors to change
depending on whether the ex_desc field is set after or before the
opcode instruction field.
Reviewed-by: Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho <caio.oliveira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
The simulator complains about using byte operands, we also have
documentation telling us.
Note that add operations on bytes seems to work fine on HW (like ADD).
Using dwords operands with CMP & SEL fixes the following tests :
dEQP-VK.spirv_assembly.type.vec*.i8.*
v2: Drop the GLK changes (Matt)
Add validator tests (Matt)
v3: Drop GLK ref (Matt)
Don't mix float/integer in MAD (Matt)
Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rafael Antognolli <rafael.antognolli@intel.com> (v1)
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
BSpec: 3017
Cc: <mesa-stable@lists.freedesktop.org>
v2:
- Adapted unit tests to make them consistent with the changes done
to the validation of half-float conversions.
v3 (Curro):
- Check all the accummulators
- Constify declarations
- Do not check src1 type in single-source instructions.
- Check for all instructions that read accumulator (either implicitly or
explicitly)
- Check restrictions in src1 too.
- Merge conditional block
- Add invalid test case.
v4 (Curro):
- Assert on 3-src instructions, as they are not validated.
- Get rid of types_are_mixed_float(), as we know instruction is mixed
float at that point.
- Remove conditions from not verified case.
- Fix brackets on conditional.
Reviewed-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net>
v2:
- Add some tests with UB type too (Jason)
v3:
- consider implicit conversions from 2src instructions too (Curro).
v4:
- Do not check src1 type in single-source instructions (Curro).
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net> (v2)
v2:
- Consider implicit conversions in 2-src instructions too (Curro)
- For restrictions that involve destination stride requirements
only validate them for Align1, since Align16 always requires
packed data.
- Skip general rule for the dst/execution type size ratio for
mixed float instructions on CHV and SKL+, these have their own
set of rules that we'll be validated separately.
v3 (Curro):
- Do not check src1 type in single-source instructions.
- Check restriction on src1.
- Remove invalid test.
Reviewed-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net>
The section 'Execution Data Types' of 3D Media GPGPU volume, which
describes execution types, is exactly the same in BDW and SKL+.
Also, this section states that there is a single execution type, so it
makes sense that this is the wider of the two floating point types
involved in mixed float mode, which is what we do for SKL+ and CHV.
v2:
- Make sure we also account for the destination type in mixed mode (Curro).
Acked-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net>
Acked-by: Jose Maria Casanova Crespo <jmcasanova@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Iago Toral Quiroga <itoral@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net>
When the destination is a BYTE type allow raw movs
even if the stride is not exact multiple of destination
type and exec type, execution type is Word and its size is 2.
This restriction was only allowing stride==2 destinations
for 8-bit types.
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Implement at brw_eu_validate the restriction from Intel Broadwell PRM,
vol 07, section "Instruction Set Reference", subsection "EUISA
Instructions", Send Message (page 990):
"r127 must not be used for return address when there is a src and
dest overlap in send instruction."
v2: Style fixes (Matt Turner)
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Cc: 18.1 <mesa-stable@lists.freedesktop.org>
This new type exposes the additional precision offered by the
accumulator register and will be used in the next patch to implement the
functionality of the PLN instruction using a pair of MAD instructions.
One weird thing to note: align1 ternary instructions may only have an
accumulator in the dst or src1 normally, but when src0's type is :NF
the accumulator is read.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
The old code used an array to store each "instruction group" (the new,
better name than the old overloaded "annotation"), and required a
memmove() to shift elements over in the array when we needed to split a
group so that we could add an error message. This was confusing and
difficult to get right, not the least of which was because the array
has a tail sentinel not included in .ann_count.
Instead use a linked list, a data structure made for efficient
insertion.
Acked-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez <siglesias@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
The disassembler does not (and should not) be modifying the data.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Rogovin <kevin.rogovin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
gcc is throwing this warning in my meson build:
../src/intel/compiler/brw_eu_validate.c:50:11: warning
argument 1 null where non-null expected [-Wnonnull]
return memmem(haystack.str, haystack.len,
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
needle.str, needle.len) != NULL;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The first check for CONTAINS has a NULL error_msg.str and 0 len. The
glibc implementation will exit without looking at any haystack bytes if
haystack.len < needle.len, so this was safe, but silence the warning
anyway by guarding against implementation variablility.
Fixes: 122ef3799d ("i965: Only insert error message if not already present")
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
KHR-GL45.shader_ballot_tests.ShaderBallotBitmasks has a MOV that hits
this validation path. MOVs don't have a src1 file, but calling
brw_inst_src1_type() was tripping on src1.file being BRW_IMMEDIATE_VALUE
and the hw_type being something invalid for immediates.
To work around this, just pretend src1 is src0 if there isn't a src1.
Fixes: 2572c2771d (i965: Validate "Special
Requirements for Handling Double Precision Data Types")
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102680
Reviewed-by: Alejandro Piñeiro <apinheiro@igalia.com>
I did not implement:
CNL's restriction on 64-bit int + align16, because I don't think
we'll ever use this combination regardless of hardware generation.
The restriction on immediate DF -> F conversions, because there's no
reason to ever generate that, and I don't even know how DF -> F
conversions are supposed to work in Align16 since (1) the dst stride
must be 1, but (2) the dst stride would have to be 2 for src and dst
strides to be aligned.