The old version of the iterators relies on a &iter->field != NULL check
which works fine on older GCC but newer GCC versions and clang have
optimizations that break if you do pointer math on a null pointer. The
correct solution to this is to do the null comparisons before we do any
sort of &iter->field or use rb_node_data to do the reverse operation.
Acked-by: Michel Dänzer <mdaenzer@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <mdaenzer@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
The new order matches that of the comparison functions accepted by the C
standard library qsort() functions. Being consistent with qsort will
hopefully help avoid developer confusion.
The only current user of the red-black tree is aub_mem.c which is pretty
easy to fix up.
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.lndwerlin@intel.com>
This is a simple, invasive, liberally licensed red-black tree
implementation. It's an invasive data structure similar to the
Linux kernel linked-list where the intention is that you embed a
rb_node struct the data structure you intend to put into the
tree.
The implementation is mostly based on the one in "Introduction to
Algorithms", third edition, by Cormen, Leiserson, Rivest, and
Stein. There were a few other key design points:
* It's an invasive data structure similar to the [Linux kernel
linked list].
* It uses NULL for leaves instead of a sentinel. This means a few
algorithms differ a small bit from the ones in "Introduction to
Algorithms".
* All search operations are inlined so that the compiler can
optimize away the function pointer call.
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho
Jason Ekstrand
Lionel Landwerlin
Jason Ekstrand