panfrost: Fix the DISCARD_WHOLE_RES case in transfer_map()
The current implementation does not synchronize on BO readiness when DISCARD_WHOLE_RES flag is set, which can lead to misbehaviours when the resource being updated is being used by one of the pending or already flushed batches. Adding unconditional BO synchronization would do the trick, but we can sometimes optimize this path by re-allocating a new BO instead of waiting for the existing one to be ready. Reported-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com> Reported-by: Heinrich Fink <heinrich.fink@daqri.com> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com> Reviewed-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2d5edf2558
commit
7fa5cd3ee3
|
@ -984,6 +984,30 @@ panfrost_flush_all_batches(struct panfrost_context *ctx, bool wait)
|
|||
util_dynarray_fini(&syncobjs);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool
|
||||
panfrost_pending_batches_access_bo(struct panfrost_context *ctx,
|
||||
const struct panfrost_bo *bo)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct panfrost_bo_access *access;
|
||||
struct hash_entry *hentry;
|
||||
|
||||
hentry = _mesa_hash_table_search(ctx->accessed_bos, bo);
|
||||
access = hentry ? hentry->data : NULL;
|
||||
if (!access)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
if (access->writer && access->writer->batch)
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
util_dynarray_foreach(&access->readers, struct panfrost_batch_fence *,
|
||||
reader) {
|
||||
if (*reader && (*reader)->batch)
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void
|
||||
panfrost_flush_batches_accessing_bo(struct panfrost_context *ctx,
|
||||
struct panfrost_bo *bo,
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -188,6 +188,10 @@ panfrost_batch_create_bo(struct panfrost_batch *batch, size_t size,
|
|||
void
|
||||
panfrost_flush_all_batches(struct panfrost_context *ctx, bool wait);
|
||||
|
||||
bool
|
||||
panfrost_pending_batches_access_bo(struct panfrost_context *ctx,
|
||||
const struct panfrost_bo *bo);
|
||||
|
||||
void
|
||||
panfrost_flush_batches_accessing_bo(struct panfrost_context *ctx,
|
||||
struct panfrost_bo *bo, uint32_t flags);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -587,8 +587,41 @@ panfrost_transfer_map(struct pipe_context *pctx,
|
|||
/* TODO: Respect usage flags */
|
||||
|
||||
if (usage & PIPE_TRANSFER_DISCARD_WHOLE_RESOURCE) {
|
||||
/* TODO: reallocate */
|
||||
//printf("debug: Missed reallocate\n");
|
||||
/* If the BO is used by one of the pending batches or if it's
|
||||
* not ready yet (still accessed by one of the already flushed
|
||||
* batches), we try to allocate a new one to avoid waiting.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (panfrost_pending_batches_access_bo(ctx, bo) ||
|
||||
!panfrost_bo_wait(bo, 0, PAN_BO_ACCESS_RW)) {
|
||||
struct panfrost_screen *screen = pan_screen(pctx->screen);
|
||||
/* We want the BO to be MMAPed. */
|
||||
uint32_t flags = bo->flags & ~PAN_BO_DELAY_MMAP;
|
||||
struct panfrost_bo *newbo = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
/* When the BO has been imported/exported, we can't
|
||||
* replace it by another one, otherwise the
|
||||
* importer/exporter wouldn't see the change we're
|
||||
* doing to it.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!(bo->flags & (PAN_BO_IMPORTED | PAN_BO_EXPORTED)))
|
||||
newbo = panfrost_bo_create(screen, bo->size,
|
||||
flags);
|
||||
|
||||
if (newbo) {
|
||||
panfrost_bo_unreference(bo);
|
||||
rsrc->bo = newbo;
|
||||
bo = newbo;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
uint32_t access = PAN_BO_ACCESS_RW;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Allocation failed or was impossible, let's
|
||||
* fall back on a flush+wait.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
panfrost_flush_batches_accessing_bo(ctx, bo,
|
||||
access);
|
||||
panfrost_bo_wait(bo, INT64_MAX, access);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else if ((usage & PIPE_TRANSFER_WRITE)
|
||||
&& resource->target == PIPE_BUFFER
|
||||
&& !util_ranges_intersect(&rsrc->valid_buffer_range, box->x, box->x + box->width)) {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue