The MPL 2.0 license is a "file-level" copyleft license vs the
"project-level" nature of the L/GPL. The intention of the websock.js
file has always been that it should be easy to incorporate into
existing projects and sites whether free/open or
proprietary/commercial. The MPL 2.0 is designed for this sort of
combination project but still requires that any distributed
modifications to noVNC source files must also be published under the
same license.
In addition, the MPL 2.0 allows the code to be used in L/GPL projects
(the secondary license clause). This means that any projects that are
already incorporating noVNC should not be impacted by this change and
in fact it should clarify the licensing situation (the exact
application of the L/GPL to web applications and interpreted code is
somewhat ambiguous).
The dependencies on include/websock.js are also updated to MPL 2.0
including util.js and webutil.js. The base64.js has been updated to
the MPL 2.0 licensed version from Mozilla.
The websockify python code (and other implementations) remain under
a LGPLv3 license.
web-socket-js now has all the functionality and fixes needed for noVNC
so remove the include/as3crypto_patched directory and the
include/web-socket-js/flash-src directory (i.e. the sources for
web-socket-js). This cleans up almost 3K from the include/ directory.
Update to web-socket-js build based on upstream (gimite/web-socket-js)
9e766377188.
The purpose of the code is to be incorporated into other web projects
(whether those are free or not). AGPL prevents combination with other
HTML and javascript that is under a weaker (or proprietary) license.
Better would be a lesser AGPL, but there is not GNU standard for that.
So LGPL-3 meets most of my requirements. If somebody modifies the
actual client code and conveys it, then they must release the changes
under LGPL-3 also.
Add some implementation notes in docs/notes.
Pierre Ossman
Joel Martin