We were using the ralloc parent in some places, which should work out to
be the shader I think, but to de-ralloc the instrs we should just pass the
existing shader pointer in.
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/11776>
This commit replaces the new_src parameter of nir_ssa_def_rewrite_uses()
with an SSA def, removes nir_ssa_def_rewrite_uses_ssa(), and rewrites
all the users as needed.
Reviewed-by: Rhys Perry <pendingchaos02@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@collabora.com>
Acked-By: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/9383>
Halt is like a return for the entire shader or exit() if you prefer to
think of it that way. Once an invocation hits a halt, it's 100% dead.
Any writes to output variables which happened before the halt do,
however, still apply.
Reviewed-by: Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho <caio.oliveira@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/7356>
After we lowered `return` into `break` - the control flow is changed and
the block with this change has a new successor, which means that in this
new successor phis should have additional source.
Since the instructions that use phis in the successor are predicated -
it's ok for a new phi source to be undef.
If `return` is lowered in a nested loop, `break` is inserted in the outer
loops, so all new blocks with break require the same changes to phis
described above.
Examples of NIR before lowering:
block block_0:
loop {
block block_1:
if ssa_2 {
block block_2:
return
// succs: block_6
} else {
block block_2:
break;
// succs: block_5
}
block block_4:
}
block block_5:
// preds: block_3
vec1 32 ssa_4 = phi block_3: ssa_1
// succs: block_6
block block_6:
Here converting return to break should add block_2 to the phis
of block_5.
block block_0:
loop {
block block_1:
loop {
block block_2:
if ssa_2 {
block block_3:
return
// succs: block_8
} else {
block block_4:
break;
// succs: block_6
}
block block_5:
}
block block_6:
break;
// succs: block_7
}
block block_7:
// preds: block_6
vec1 32 ssa_4 = phi block_6: ssa_1
// succs: block_8
block block_8:
Here converting return to break will insert conditional break in
the outer loop, changing block_6 predcessors.
Cc: <mesa-stable@lists.freedesktop.org>
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/3322
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/3498
Signed-off-by: Danylo Piliaiev <danylo.piliaiev@globallogic.com>
Reviewed-by: Rhys Perry <pendingchaos02@gmail.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/6186>
In the case where end was a instruction-based cursor, we would mix up
our blocks and end up with block_begin pointing after the second split.
This causes a segfault as the cf_node list walk at the end of the
function never terminates properly. There's also a possibility of
mix-up if begin is an instruction-based cursor which was found by
inspection.
Fixes: fc7f2d2364 "nir/cf: add new control modification API's"
Reviewed-by: Connor Abbott <cwabbott0@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/6866>
All things being equal is better to keep the original order. Since
the new block is empty, push the phis in order to tail.
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Schürmann <daniel.schuermann@campus.tu-berlin.de>
If the block in which the jump is inserted is the predecessor of a phi
then we need to remove phi sources otherwise the phi may end up with
things improperly connected. This fixes the following CTS test when
dEQP is run with SPIR-V optimization recipe 1:
dEQP-VK.glsl.functions.control_flow.return_in_nested_loop_vertex
Cc: mesa-stable@lists.freedesktop.org
Reviewed-by: Iago Toral Quiroga <itoral@igalia.com>
Now that the NIR casting functions have type assertions, we have a bunch of
assertions that aren't needed anymore.
Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Reviewed-by: Connor Abbott <cwabbott0@gmail.com>
One of NIR's invariants is that control flow lists always start and end
with blocks. There's no good reason why we should return a cf_node from
these functions since we know that it's always a block. Making it a block
lets us remove a bunch of code.
Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Reviewed-by: Connor Abbott <cwabbott0@gmail.com>
When NIR was first introduced, Connor added this fake-edge hack to work
around issues related to unreachable blocks. Thanks to GLSL IR's jump
lowering code, the only unreachable code you can have is a block after an
infinite loop. With SPIR-V, we didn't have the jump lowering code so we
could also end up with the "if (...) { break; } else { continue; }" case
which generates an unreachable block after the if. Because of this, most
of NIR had to be fixed up for handling unreachable blocks. The only
remaining case of not handling unreachable blocks was specifically the
block-after-infinite-loop case in dead_cf which was fixed by the previous
commit. We can now delete the fake edge hack.
Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Reviewed-by: Connor Abbott <cwabbott0@gmail.com>
This matches the "foreach x in container" pattern found in many other
programming languages. Generated by the following regular expression:
s/nir_foreach_phi_src(\([^,]*\),\s*\([^,]*\))/nir_foreach_phi_src(\2, \1)/
and a similar expression for nir_foreach_phi_src_safe.
Reviewed-by: Eduardo Lima Mitev <elima@igalia.com>
This matches the "foreach x in container" pattern found in many other
programming languages. Generated by the following regular expression:
s/nir_foreach_instr(\([^,]*\),\s*\([^,]*\))/nir_foreach_instr(\2, \1)/
and similar expressions for nir_foreach_instr_safe etc.
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
v2:
- Make the users to give the right bit_sizes as arguments (Jason).
Signed-off-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez <siglesias@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
This can happen if a function ends in a return instruction and you remove
the return.
Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Connor Abbott <cwabbott0@gmail.com>
Emma Anholt
Jason Ekstrand
Jason Ekstrand
Danylo Piliaiev
Karol Herbst
Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho
Eric Engestrom
Matt Turner
Timothy Arceri
Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
Emil Velikov