- remove mtypes.h from most header files
- add main/menums.h for often used definitions
- remove main/core.h
v2: fix radv build
Reviewed-by: Brian Paul <brianp@vmware.com>
Reduces my build from 2075 warnings to 2023 warnings by silencing 52
instances of things like
src/compiler/nir/nir_constant_expressions.c: In function ‘evaluate_bfi’:
src/compiler/nir/nir_constant_expressions.c:1812:61: warning: unused parameter ‘bit_size’ [-Wunused-parameter]
evaluate_bfi(MAYBE_UNUSED unsigned num_components, unsigned bit_size,
^~~~~~~~
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez <siglesias@igalia.com>
For opcodes such as the nir_op_pack_64_2x32 for which all sources and
destinations have explicit sizes, the bit_size parameter to the evaluate
function is pointless and *should* do nothing. Previously, we were
always switching on the bit_size and asserting if it isn't one of the
sizes in the list. This generates way more code than needed and is a
bit cruel because it doesn't let us have a bit_size of zero on an ALU op
which shouldn't need a bit_size.
Reviewed-by: Eduardo Lima Mitev <elima@igalia.com>
Apart from avoiding some unneeded size cases, this shouldn't have any
actual functional impact.
Reviewed-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
nir/nir_constant_expressions.c:290:25: warning: unused parameter 'num_components' [-Wunused-parameter]
evaluate_ball3(unsigned num_components, nir_const_value *_src)
^
nir/nir_constant_expressions.c: In function 'evaluate_fddx':
nir/nir_constant_expressions.c:1282:57: warning: unused parameter '_src' [-Wunused-parameter]
evaluate_fddx(unsigned num_components, nir_const_value *_src)
^
v2: Unconditionally mark the parameters as MAYBE_UNUSED instead of
conditionally adding (void) casts to keep the generator simple.
Suggested by Jason.
Number of total warnings in my build reduced from 1575 to 1485
(reduction of 89).
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
nir/nir_constant_expressions.c: In function 'evaluate_ball2':
nir/nir_constant_expressions.c:279:7: warning: missing initializer for field 'z' of 'struct bool_vec' [-Wmissing-field-initializers]
};
^
nir/nir_constant_expressions.c:234:10: note: 'z' declared here
bool z;
^
Number of total warnings in my build reduced from 2532 to 2304
(reduction of 228).
v2: Initialize bool vectors with 0 instead of false to keep the
generator simpler. Suggested by Ken.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
There's no good reason for it to be a struct of an anonymous union.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96221
Tested-by: Vinson Lee <vlee@freedesktop.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Some opcodes need explicit bitsizes, and sometimes we need to use the
double version when constant folding.
v2: fix output type for u2f (Iago)
v3: do not change vecN opcodes to be float. The next commit will add
infrastructure to enable 64-bit integer constant folding so this is isn't
really necessary. Also, that created problems with source modifiers in
some cases (Iago)
v4 (Jason):
- do not change bcsel to work in terms of floats
- leave ldexp generic
Squashed changes to handle different bit sizes when constant
folding since otherwise we would break the build.
v2:
- Use the bit-size information from the opcode information if defined (Iago)
- Use helpers to get type size and base type of nir_alu_type enum (Sam)
- Do not fallback to sized types to guess bit-size information. (Jason)
Squashed changes in i965 and gallium/nir drivers to support sized types.
These functions should only see sized types, but we can't make that change
until we make sure that nir uses the sized versions in all the relevant places.
A later commit will address this.
Signed-off-by: Iago Toral Quiroga <itoral@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez <siglesias@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Reviewed-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez <siglesias@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Iago Toral Quiroga <itoral@igalia.com>