When the EU validator encountered an error, it would add an annotation
to the disassembly. Unfortunately, the code to insert an error assumed
that the next instruction would start at (offset + sizeof(brw_inst)),
which is not true if the instruction with an error is compacted.
This could lead to cascading disassembly errors, where we started trying
to decode the next instruction at the wrong offset, and getting lots of
scary looking output:
ERROR: Register Regioning patterns where [...]
(-f0.1.any16h) illegal(*** invalid execution size value 6 ) { align1 $7.src atomic };
(+f0.1.any16h) illegal.sat(*** invalid execution size value 6 ) { align1 $9.src AccWrEnable };
illegal(*** invalid execution size value 6 ) { align1 $11.src };
(+f0.1) illegal.sat(*** invalid execution size value 6 ) { align1 F@2 AccWrEnable };
(+f0.1) illegal.sat(*** invalid execution size value 6 ) { align1 F@2 AccWrEnable };
(+f0.1) illegal.sat(*** invalid execution size value 6 ) { align1 $15.src AccWrEnable };
illegal(*** invalid execution size value 6 ) { align1 $15.src };
(+f0.1) illegal.sat.g.f0.1(*** invalid execution size value 6 ) { align1 $13.src AccWrEnable };
Only the first instruction was actually wrong - the rest are just a
result of starting the disassembler at the wrong offset. Trash ensues!
To fix this, just pass the instruction size in a few layers so we can
record the next offset properly.
Cc: mesa-stable
Reviewed-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/17624>
This structure will contain the opcode mapping tables in the next
commit. For now, this is the mechanical change to plumb it into all
the necessary places, and it continues simply holding devinfo.
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/17309>
Shader instructions which use UIP/JIP now get formatted with a label
in addition with immediate value, labels have "LABEL%d" format.
v2: - Consider brw_jump_scale when calculating label's offset
From: "Lonnberg, Toni" <toni.lonnberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Danylo Piliaiev <danylo.piliaiev@globallogic.com>
Reviewed-by: Sagar Ghuge <sagar.ghuge@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4245>
So we can eventually remove the cycle count estimates from the CFG
data structure and consolidate performance information in the
brw::performance object.
It would be cleaner to pass the brw::performance object directly to
the disassembler but that isn't straightforward since the disassembler
is built as a plain C file unlike the rest of the compiler back-end.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
The brw_disasm_info header is included by certain tools in order to get
shader assembly from binaries so it's a semi-external header. Including
brw_cfg.h also pulls in brw_shader.h so you end up getting quite a bit
of our back-end compiler internals. Instead, make the couple of forward
declarations we need and make the header more stand-alone. This fixes
the meson build.
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Fixes: 4f82b17287
It was the only file named intel_* in the compiler.
Reviewed-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez <siglesias@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
2017-11-17 12:14:38 -08:00
Renamed from src/intel/compiler/intel_asm_annotation.h (Browse further)
Kenneth Graunke
Anuj Phogat
Danylo Piliaiev
Francisco Jerez
Jason Ekstrand
Matt Turner