This fixes a regression introduced with scan&reduce operations
on GFX10. Note that some subgroups CTS still fail on GFX10 but
I assume it's a different issue.
This fixes dEQP-VK.subgroups.arithmetic.*.subgroupexclusive*.
Fixes: 227c29a80d "amd/common/gfx10: implement scan & reduce operations"
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>
By adding one more helper to ac_llvm_build, we can also easily keep
vector stores together.
Fixes the
tests/spec/glsl-1.30/execution/fs-large-local-array-vec4.shader_test
piglit test.
Fixes: 74470baebb ("ac/nir: Lower large indirect variables to scratch")
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák <marek.olsak@amd.com
This might happen when a pipeline doesn't define the vertex input
state, so the buffer data format is 0 (aka INVALID).
This fixes crashes when compiling some shaders on GFX10.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>
inaccessiblememonly means that it doesn't modify memory accesible via
normal LLVM pointers. This lets LLVM's dead store elimination, memcpy
forwarding, etc. ignore functions with this attribute. We don't
represent descriptors as pointers, so this property is always true of
buffer and image stores. There are plans to represent descriptors via
pointers, but this just means that now nothing is inaccessiblememonly,
as LLVM will then understand loads/stores via its usual alias analysis.
Radeonsi was mistakenly only setting it if the driver could prove that
there were no reads, and then it was cargo-culted into ac_llvm_build
and ac_llvm_to_nir. Rip it out of everything.
statistics with nir enabled:
Totals from affected shaders:
SGPRS: 152 -> 152 (0.00 %)
VGPRS: 128 -> 132 (3.12 %)
Spilled SGPRs: 0 -> 0 (0.00 %)
Spilled VGPRs: 0 -> 0 (0.00 %)
Private memory VGPRs: 0 -> 0 (0.00 %)
Scratch size: 0 -> 0 (0.00 %) dwords per thread
Code Size: 9324 -> 9244 (-0.86 %) bytes
LDS: 2 -> 2 (0.00 %) blocks
Max Waves: 17 -> 17 (0.00 %)
Wait states: 0 -> 0 (0.00 %)
The only difference was a manhattan31 shader.
Acked-by: Timothy Arceri <tarceri@itsqueeze.com>
Acked-by: Nicolai Hähnle <nicolai.haehnle@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák <marek.olsak@amd.com>
LLVM r363339 changed llvm.amdgcn.icmp.i* to llvm.amdgcn.icmp.i64.i*.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák <marek.olsak@amd.com>
Reviewed-By: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>
It's unsupported, only load/store format with vec3 are supported.
Fixes: 6970a9a6ca ("ac,radv: remove the vec3 restriction with LLVM 9+")"
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák <marek.olsak@amd.com>
Acked-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
We already use GFX9 and I don't want us to have confusing naming
in the driver. GFXn naming is better from the driver perspective,
because it's the real version of the gfx portion of the hw. Also,
CIK means Bonaire-Kaveri-Kabini, it doesn't mean CI.
It shouldn't confuse our SDMA, UVD, VCE etc. code much. Those have
nothing to do with GFXn and they have their own version numbers.
For consistency with ac_build_llvm8_buffer_{load,store}_common
helpers and that will help a bit for removing the vec3 restriction.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>
This changes requires LLVM r356465.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák <marek.olsak@amd.com>
This changes requires LLVM r356465.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák <marek.olsak@amd.com>
LLVM 9+ now supports 8-bit and 16-bit types.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák <marek.olsak@amd.com>
This changes the predicate from LessThan to Equal.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák <marek.olsak@amd.com>