ralloc: don't leave out the alignment factor
Experimentation shows that without alignment factor gcc and clang choose
a factor of 16 even on IA-32, which doesn't match what malloc() uses (8).
The problem is it makes gcc assume the pointer is 16 byte aligned, so
with -O3 it starts using aligned SSE instructions that later fault,
so always specify a suitable alignment factor.
Cc: Jonas Pfeil <pfeiljonas@gmx.de>
Fixes: cd2b55e5
"ralloc: Make sure ralloc() allocations match malloc()'s alignment."
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100049
Signed-off-by: Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas@gmail.com>
Tested by: Mike Lothian <mike@fireburn.co.uk>
Tested by: Jonas Pfeil <pfeiljonas@gmx.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b384c23b9e
commit
ff494fe999
|
@ -59,8 +59,10 @@ _CRTIMP int _vscprintf(const char *format, va_list argptr);
|
|||
struct
|
||||
#ifdef _MSC_VER
|
||||
__declspec(align(8))
|
||||
#elif defined(__LP64__)
|
||||
__attribute__((aligned(16)))
|
||||
#else
|
||||
__attribute__((aligned))
|
||||
__attribute__((aligned(8)))
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
ralloc_header
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue