i965: Move BEGIN_BATCH() into same control flow as ADVANCE_BATCH().
BEGIN_BATCH() and ADVANCE_BATCH() will contain "do {" and "} while (0)" respectively to allow declaring local variables used by intervening OUT_BATCH macros. As such, BEGIN_BATCH() and ADVANCE_BATCH() need to be in the same control flow. Reviewed-by: Iago Toral Quiroga <itoral@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
141e1eb29f
commit
fbf3aebf1f
|
@ -261,17 +261,17 @@ static void brw_emit_prim(struct brw_context *brw,
|
|||
indirect_flag = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
BEGIN_BATCH(brw->gen >= 7 ? 7 : 6);
|
||||
|
||||
if (brw->gen >= 7) {
|
||||
if (brw->predicate.state == BRW_PREDICATE_STATE_USE_BIT)
|
||||
predicate_enable = GEN7_3DPRIM_PREDICATE_ENABLE;
|
||||
else
|
||||
predicate_enable = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
BEGIN_BATCH(7);
|
||||
OUT_BATCH(CMD_3D_PRIM << 16 | (7 - 2) | indirect_flag | predicate_enable);
|
||||
OUT_BATCH(hw_prim | vertex_access_type);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
BEGIN_BATCH(6);
|
||||
OUT_BATCH(CMD_3D_PRIM << 16 | (6 - 2) |
|
||||
hw_prim << GEN4_3DPRIM_TOPOLOGY_TYPE_SHIFT |
|
||||
vertex_access_type);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue