gallivm: Explicitly disable unsupported CPU features.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92214 CC: "10.6 11.0" <mesa-stable@lists.freedesktop.org> Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland@vmware.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
70b06fb5d5
commit
ea421e919a
|
@ -498,50 +498,46 @@ lp_build_create_jit_compiler_for_module(LLVMExecutionEngineRef *OutJIT,
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
llvm::SmallVector<std::string, 16> MAttrs;
|
||||
if (util_cpu_caps.has_sse) {
|
||||
MAttrs.push_back("+sse");
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (util_cpu_caps.has_sse2) {
|
||||
MAttrs.push_back("+sse2");
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (util_cpu_caps.has_sse3) {
|
||||
MAttrs.push_back("+sse3");
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (util_cpu_caps.has_ssse3) {
|
||||
MAttrs.push_back("+ssse3");
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (util_cpu_caps.has_sse4_1) {
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(PIPE_ARCH_X86) || defined(PIPE_ARCH_X86_64)
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We need to unset attributes because sometimes LLVM mistakenly assumes
|
||||
* certain features are present given the processor name.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92214
|
||||
* http://llvm.org/PR25021
|
||||
* http://llvm.org/PR19429
|
||||
* http://llvm.org/PR16721
|
||||
*/
|
||||
MAttrs.push_back(util_cpu_caps.has_sse ? "+sse" : "-sse" );
|
||||
MAttrs.push_back(util_cpu_caps.has_sse2 ? "+sse2" : "-sse2" );
|
||||
MAttrs.push_back(util_cpu_caps.has_sse3 ? "+sse3" : "-sse3" );
|
||||
MAttrs.push_back(util_cpu_caps.has_ssse3 ? "+ssse3" : "-ssse3" );
|
||||
#if HAVE_LLVM >= 0x0304
|
||||
MAttrs.push_back("+sse4.1");
|
||||
MAttrs.push_back(util_cpu_caps.has_sse4_1 ? "+sse4.1" : "-sse4.1");
|
||||
#else
|
||||
MAttrs.push_back("+sse41");
|
||||
MAttrs.push_back(util_cpu_caps.has_sse4_1 ? "+sse41" : "-sse41" );
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (util_cpu_caps.has_sse4_2) {
|
||||
#if HAVE_LLVM >= 0x0304
|
||||
MAttrs.push_back("+sse4.2");
|
||||
MAttrs.push_back(util_cpu_caps.has_sse4_2 ? "+sse4.2" : "-sse4.2");
|
||||
#else
|
||||
MAttrs.push_back("+sse42");
|
||||
MAttrs.push_back(util_cpu_caps.has_sse4_2 ? "+sse42" : "-sse42" );
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (util_cpu_caps.has_avx) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* AVX feature is not automatically detected from CPUID by the X86 target
|
||||
* yet, because the old (yet default) JIT engine is not capable of
|
||||
* emitting the opcodes. On newer llvm versions it is and at least some
|
||||
* versions (tested with 3.3) will emit avx opcodes without this anyway.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
MAttrs.push_back("+avx");
|
||||
if (util_cpu_caps.has_f16c) {
|
||||
MAttrs.push_back("+f16c");
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (util_cpu_caps.has_avx2) {
|
||||
MAttrs.push_back("+avx2");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (util_cpu_caps.has_altivec) {
|
||||
MAttrs.push_back("+altivec");
|
||||
}
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* AVX feature is not automatically detected from CPUID by the X86 target
|
||||
* yet, because the old (yet default) JIT engine is not capable of
|
||||
* emitting the opcodes. On newer llvm versions it is and at least some
|
||||
* versions (tested with 3.3) will emit avx opcodes without this anyway.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
MAttrs.push_back(util_cpu_caps.has_avx ? "+avx" : "-avx");
|
||||
MAttrs.push_back(util_cpu_caps.has_f16c ? "+f16c" : "-f16c");
|
||||
MAttrs.push_back(util_cpu_caps.has_avx2 ? "+avx2" : "-avx2");
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(PIPE_ARCH_PPC)
|
||||
MAttrs.push_back(util_cpu_caps.has_altivec ? "+altivec" : "-altivec");
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
builder.setMAttrs(MAttrs);
|
||||
|
||||
#if HAVE_LLVM >= 0x0305
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue