i965: Rename do_flush_locked to submit_batch().

do_flush_locked isn't a great name - especially given that there's no
locking going on in our code relating to execbuf.

Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
This commit is contained in:
Kenneth Graunke 2017-09-21 13:30:47 -07:00
parent 962cc1bd17
commit e1623da818
1 changed files with 4 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -777,7 +777,7 @@ execbuffer(int fd,
}
static int
do_flush_locked(struct brw_context *brw, int in_fence_fd, int *out_fence_fd)
submit_batch(struct brw_context *brw, int in_fence_fd, int *out_fence_fd)
{
const struct gen_device_info *devinfo = &brw->screen->devinfo;
__DRIscreen *dri_screen = brw->screen->driScrnPriv;
@ -865,7 +865,8 @@ do_flush_locked(struct brw_context *brw, int in_fence_fd, int *out_fence_fd)
brw_check_for_reset(brw);
if (ret != 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "intel_do_flush_locked failed: %s\n", strerror(-ret));
fprintf(stderr, "i965: Failed to submit batchbuffer: %s\n",
strerror(-ret));
exit(1);
}
@ -914,7 +915,7 @@ _intel_batchbuffer_flush_fence(struct brw_context *brw,
brw->batch.state_relocs.reloc_count);
}
ret = do_flush_locked(brw, in_fence_fd, out_fence_fd);
ret = submit_batch(brw, in_fence_fd, out_fence_fd);
if (unlikely(INTEL_DEBUG & DEBUG_SYNC)) {
fprintf(stderr, "waiting for idle\n");