From ae4f48b2bc3b9e1969be738fe230a7b5a880bd0d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 13:05:02 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] pan/bi: Don't set the back-to-back bit yet

This is bad for performance but we can't assume it's true without some
analysis, which we presently don't do. Leave it for future work and
don't break the present.

Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4396>
---
 src/panfrost/bifrost/bi_schedule.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/panfrost/bifrost/bi_schedule.c b/src/panfrost/bifrost/bi_schedule.c
index 0f72fc12713..b3f7ca605c3 100644
--- a/src/panfrost/bifrost/bi_schedule.c
+++ b/src/panfrost/bifrost/bi_schedule.c
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ bi_schedule(bi_context *ctx)
 
                         ids = ids & 1;
                         last_id = u->scoreboard_id;
-                        u->back_to_back = true;
+                        u->back_to_back = false;
 
                         u->constant_count = 1;
                         u->constants[0] = ins->constant.u64;