i965/fs: Don't force MASK_DISABLE on INDIRECT_MOV instructions
It should work fine without it and the visitor can set it if it wants. Reviewed-by: Kristian Høgsberg <krh@bitplanet.net> Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
40a8fe04dc
commit
7e08a13009
|
@ -366,7 +366,6 @@ fs_generator::generate_mov_indirect(fs_inst *inst,
|
|||
assert(inst->exec_size == 8 || devinfo->gen >= 8);
|
||||
|
||||
brw_MOV(p, addr, indirect_byte_offset);
|
||||
brw_inst_set_mask_control(devinfo, brw_last_inst, BRW_MASK_DISABLE);
|
||||
brw_MOV(p, dst, retype(brw_VxH_indirect(0, imm_byte_offset), dst.type));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue