i965/fs: Don't force MASK_DISABLE on INDIRECT_MOV instructions

It should work fine without it and the visitor can set it if it wants.

Reviewed-by: Kristian Høgsberg <krh@bitplanet.net>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
This commit is contained in:
Jason Ekstrand 2015-11-24 09:03:29 -08:00
parent 40a8fe04dc
commit 7e08a13009
1 changed files with 0 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -366,7 +366,6 @@ fs_generator::generate_mov_indirect(fs_inst *inst,
assert(inst->exec_size == 8 || devinfo->gen >= 8);
brw_MOV(p, addr, indirect_byte_offset);
brw_inst_set_mask_control(devinfo, brw_last_inst, BRW_MASK_DISABLE);
brw_MOV(p, dst, retype(brw_VxH_indirect(0, imm_byte_offset), dst.type));
}