winsys/amdgpu: don't inc/dec num_active_ioctls for backing BOs of sparse BOs

It's not correct.

Reviewed-by: Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer <pierre-eric.pelloux-prayer@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Zoltán Böszörményi <zboszor@gmail.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/8849>
This commit is contained in:
Marek Olšák 2021-02-03 01:46:39 -05:00 committed by Marge Bot
parent 77d111fcbf
commit 7d76b912bc
1 changed files with 3 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -1420,7 +1420,6 @@ static bool amdgpu_add_sparse_backing_buffers(struct amdgpu_cs_context *cs)
cs->real_buffers[idx].usage = buffer->usage & ~RADEON_USAGE_SYNCHRONIZED;
cs->real_buffers[idx].u.real.priority_usage = buffer->u.real.priority_usage;
p_atomic_inc(&backing->bo->num_active_ioctls);
}
simple_mtx_unlock(&bo->lock);
@ -1440,6 +1439,7 @@ static void amdgpu_cs_submit_ib(void *job, int thread_index)
bool has_user_fence = amdgpu_cs_has_user_fence(cs);
bool use_bo_list_create = ws->info.drm_minor < 27;
struct drm_amdgpu_bo_list_in bo_list_in;
unsigned initial_num_real_buffers = cs->num_real_buffers;
#if DEBUG
/* Prepare the buffer list. */
@ -1721,7 +1721,8 @@ cleanup:
cs->error_code = r;
for (i = 0; i < cs->num_real_buffers; i++)
/* Only decrement num_active_ioctls for those buffers where we incremented it. */
for (i = 0; i < initial_num_real_buffers; i++)
p_atomic_dec(&cs->real_buffers[i].bo->num_active_ioctls);
for (i = 0; i < cs->num_slab_buffers; i++)
p_atomic_dec(&cs->slab_buffers[i].bo->num_active_ioctls);