nir/spirv: fix a bad assertion in the decoration handling
We should be asserting that the parent decoration didn't hand us a member if the child decoration did, but different child decorations may obviously have different members.
This commit is contained in:
parent
70d2336e7e
commit
73351c6a18
|
@ -184,17 +184,20 @@ _foreach_decoration_helper(struct vtn_builder *b,
|
|||
struct vtn_value *value,
|
||||
vtn_decoration_foreach_cb cb, void *data)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int new_member = member;
|
||||
|
||||
for (struct vtn_decoration *dec = value->decoration; dec; dec = dec->next) {
|
||||
if (dec->member >= 0) {
|
||||
assert(member == -1);
|
||||
member = dec->member;
|
||||
new_member = dec->member;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (dec->group) {
|
||||
assert(dec->group->value_type == vtn_value_type_decoration_group);
|
||||
_foreach_decoration_helper(b, base_value, member, dec->group, cb, data);
|
||||
_foreach_decoration_helper(b, base_value, new_member, dec->group,
|
||||
cb, data);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
cb(b, base_value, member, dec, data);
|
||||
cb(b, base_value, new_member, dec, data);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue