nir: Fix misspellings.

Reviewed-by: Dylan Baker <dylan@pnwbakers.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>

src/compiler/nir/nir.h

@@ -1908,7 +1908,7 @@ nir_register *nir_local_reg_create(nir_function_impl *impl);
 
 void nir_reg_remove(nir_register *reg);
 
-/** Adds a variable to the appropreate list in nir_shader */
+/** Adds a variable to the appropriate list in nir_shader */
 void nir_shader_add_variable(nir_shader *shader, nir_variable *var);
 
 static inline void

src/compiler/nir/nir_from_ssa.c

@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ ssa_def_dominates(nir_ssa_def *a, nir_ssa_def *b)
 
 /* The following data structure, which I have named merge_set is a way of
  * representing a set registers of non-interfering registers.  This is
- * based on the concept of a "dominence forest" presented in "Fast Copy
+ * based on the concept of a "dominance forest" presented in "Fast Copy
  * Coalescing and Live-Range Identification" by Budimlic et. al. but the
  * implementation concept is taken from  "Revisiting Out-of-SSA Translation
  * for Correctness, Code Quality, and Efficiency" by Boissinot et. al..
@@ -71,8 +71,8 @@ ssa_def_dominates(nir_ssa_def *a, nir_ssa_def *b)
  * Each SSA definition is associated with a merge_node and the association
  * is represented by a combination of a hash table and the "def" parameter
  * in the merge_node structure.  The merge_set stores a linked list of
- * merge_nodes in dominence order of the ssa definitions.  (Since the
- * liveness analysis pass indexes the SSA values in dominence order for us,
+ * merge_nodes in dominance order of the ssa definitions.  (Since the
+ * liveness analysis pass indexes the SSA values in dominance order for us,
  * this is an easy thing to keep up.)  It is assumed that no pair of the
  * nodes in a given set interfere.  Merging two sets or checking for
  * interference can be done in a single linear-time merge-sort walk of the

src/compiler/nir/nir_lower_returns.c

@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ lower_returns_in_if(nir_if *if_stmt, struct lower_returns_state *state)
     * returns inside of the body of the if.  If we're in a loop, then these
     * were lowered to breaks which automatically skip to the end of the
     * loop so we don't have to do anything.  If we're not in a loop, then
-    * all we know is that the return flag is set appropreately and that the
+    * all we know is that the return flag is set appropriately and that the
     * recursive calls ensured that nothing gets executed *inside* the if
     * after a return.  In order to ensure nothing outside gets executed
     * after a return, we need to predicate everything following on the

src/compiler/nir/nir_move_vec_src_uses_to_dest.c

@@ -114,10 +114,10 @@ move_vec_src_uses_to_dest_block(nir_block *block)
             if (vec->src[j].src.ssa != vec->src[i].src.ssa)
                continue;
 
-            /* Mark the given chanle as having been handled */
+            /* Mark the given channel as having been handled */
             srcs_remaining &= ~(1 << j);
 
-            /* Mark the appropreate channel as coming from src j */
+            /* Mark the appropriate channel as coming from src j */
             swizzle[vec->src[j].swizzle[0]] = j;
          }