dri: Also support the loader with libudev.so.0.

As far as I know, this should be safe.  If not, we have to decide whether
to have variable lookup of the functions, or just drop support for .so.0
(which is a year and a half old it looks like)

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74127
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Eric Anholt 2014-01-30 10:30:57 -08:00
parent dc00ec154b
commit 63546b8e3d
1 changed files with 10 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -102,6 +102,16 @@ udev_dlopen_handle(void)
{
if (!udev_handle) {
udev_handle = dlopen("libudev.so.1", RTLD_LOCAL | RTLD_LAZY);
if (!udev_handle) {
/* libudev.so.1 changed the return types of the two unref functions
* from voids to pointers. We don't use those return values, and the
* only ABI I've heard that cares about this kind of change (calling
* a function with a void * return that actually only returns void)
* might be ia64.
*/
udev_handle = dlopen("libudev.so.0", RTLD_LOCAL | RTLD_LAZY);
}
}
return udev_handle;