glsl: Let the constructor figure out the types of switch-related expressions.

I noticed this while unindenting the code.

Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Eric Anholt 2012-05-14 08:39:54 -07:00
parent 5462f3679a
commit 5d6ea16dfe
1 changed files with 1 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -3731,7 +3731,6 @@ ast_case_label::hir(exec_list *instructions,
new(ctx) ir_dereference_variable(state->switch_state.test_var);
ir_rvalue *const test_cond = new(ctx) ir_expression(ir_binop_all_equal,
glsl_type::bool_type,
label_const,
deref_test_var);
@ -3788,9 +3787,7 @@ ast_iteration_statement::condition_to_hir(ir_loop *stmt,
* like 'if (!condition) break;' as the loop termination condition.
*/
ir_rvalue *const not_cond =
new(ctx) ir_expression(ir_unop_logic_not, glsl_type::bool_type,
cond,
NULL);
new(ctx) ir_expression(ir_unop_logic_not, cond);
ir_if *const if_stmt = new(ctx) ir_if(not_cond);