glsl: Let the constructor figure out the types of switch-related expressions.
I noticed this while unindenting the code. Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org> Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
5462f3679a
commit
5d6ea16dfe
|
@ -3731,7 +3731,6 @@ ast_case_label::hir(exec_list *instructions,
|
|||
new(ctx) ir_dereference_variable(state->switch_state.test_var);
|
||||
|
||||
ir_rvalue *const test_cond = new(ctx) ir_expression(ir_binop_all_equal,
|
||||
glsl_type::bool_type,
|
||||
label_const,
|
||||
deref_test_var);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -3788,9 +3787,7 @@ ast_iteration_statement::condition_to_hir(ir_loop *stmt,
|
|||
* like 'if (!condition) break;' as the loop termination condition.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ir_rvalue *const not_cond =
|
||||
new(ctx) ir_expression(ir_unop_logic_not, glsl_type::bool_type,
|
||||
cond,
|
||||
NULL);
|
||||
new(ctx) ir_expression(ir_unop_logic_not, cond);
|
||||
|
||||
ir_if *const if_stmt = new(ctx) ir_if(not_cond);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue