nir: fix if condition propagation for alu use
We need to update the cursor before we check if the alu use is
dominated by the if condition. Previously we were checking if
the current location of the alu instruction was dominated by
the if condition which would miss some optimisation opportunities.
Fixes: a3b4cb3458
("nir/opt_if: Rework condition propagation")
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
802ae533ab
commit
5b757b4097
|
@ -444,11 +444,10 @@ propagate_condition_eval(nir_builder *b, nir_if *nif, nir_src *use_src,
|
|||
bool is_if_condition)
|
||||
{
|
||||
bool bool_value;
|
||||
b->cursor = nir_before_src(alu_use, is_if_condition);
|
||||
if (!evaluate_if_condition(nif, b->cursor, &bool_value))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
b->cursor = nir_before_src(alu_use, is_if_condition);
|
||||
|
||||
nir_ssa_def *def[2] = {0};
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0; i < nir_op_infos[alu->op].num_inputs; i++) {
|
||||
if (alu->src[i].src.ssa == use_src->ssa) {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue