r600/sb: Fix an &/&& mistake

gcc says:

    sb/sb_sched.cpp: In member function 'bool r600_sb::alu_group_tracker::try_reserve(r600_sb::alu_node*)':
    sb/sb_sched.cpp:492:7: warning: suggest parentheses around operand of '!' or change '&' to '&&' or '!' to '~' [-Wparentheses]
      if (!trans & fbs)

It happens to be harmless; if fbs is ever non-zero, it will be VEC_210,
which is 5, so (!trans & 5) == 1 and the branch works as expected.  But
logical AND is clearly what was meant.

Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Adam Jackson 2015-07-21 12:08:20 -04:00
parent 545dec5b3e
commit 5b4a7ec8f1
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -489,7 +489,7 @@ bool alu_group_tracker::try_reserve(alu_node* n) {
n->bc.bank_swizzle = 0;
if (!trans & fbs)
if (!trans && fbs)
n->bc.bank_swizzle = VEC_210;
if (gpr.try_reserve(n)) {