amd/addrlib: add back the incorrect original DCC checking
This reduces Mesa-specific changes. is_dcc_supported_by_CB() should protect against getting there. Acked-by: Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer <pierre-eric.pelloux-prayer@amd.com> Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/9668>
This commit is contained in:
parent
042d24971e
commit
59912cd4cf
|
@ -384,9 +384,10 @@ ADDR_E_RETURNCODE Gfx10Lib::HwlComputeDccInfo(
|
|||
{
|
||||
ADDR_E_RETURNCODE ret = ADDR_OK;
|
||||
|
||||
if (pIn->swizzleMode != ADDR_SW_64KB_Z_X && pIn->swizzleMode != ADDR_SW_64KB_R_X)
|
||||
if (IsLinear(pIn->swizzleMode) || IsBlock256b(pIn->swizzleMode))
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Hardware does not support DCC for this swizzle mode.
|
||||
// Hardware support dcc for 256 swizzle mode, but address lib will not support it because we only
|
||||
// select 256 swizzle mode for small surface, and it's not helpful to enable dcc for small surface.
|
||||
ret = ADDR_INVALIDPARAMS;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (m_settings.dccUnsup3DSwDis && IsTex3d(pIn->resourceType) && IsDisplaySwizzle(pIn->swizzleMode))
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue