i965/disasm: Use Gen6+ SFID case labels.
Most developers will recognize the Gen6+ SFID names more quickly than the Gen4-5 ones. Given that they're the same values, just use the new names. Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org> Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Kristian Høgsberg <krh@bitplanet.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
4fe78f4cc2
commit
3603dfff6f
|
@ -1310,7 +1310,8 @@ brw_disassemble_inst(FILE *file, struct brw_context *brw, brw_inst *inst,
|
|||
string(file, ")");
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case BRW_SFID_DATAPORT_READ:
|
||||
case GEN6_SFID_DATAPORT_SAMPLER_CACHE:
|
||||
/* aka BRW_SFID_DATAPORT_READ on Gen4-5 */
|
||||
if (brw->gen >= 6) {
|
||||
format(file, " (%d, %d, %d, %d)",
|
||||
brw_inst_binding_table_index(brw, inst),
|
||||
|
@ -1325,7 +1326,8 @@ brw_disassemble_inst(FILE *file, struct brw_context *brw, brw_inst *inst,
|
|||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case BRW_SFID_DATAPORT_WRITE:
|
||||
case GEN6_SFID_DATAPORT_RENDER_CACHE:
|
||||
/* aka BRW_SFID_DATAPORT_WRITE on Gen4-5 */
|
||||
if (brw->gen >= 7) {
|
||||
format(file, " (");
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue