i965: Don't use GCC extension for ?: with only two operands.

From the "apparently I don't know C" files...GCC apparently supports:

    x ?: y

which is equivalent to

    x ? x : y

except that it doesn't cause side-effects to occur twice.  See:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Conditionals.html#Conditionals

This was confusing and looked like a typo.  It doesn't really buy us
anything, so just write the obvious code in normal C.

Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Reviewed-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez <siglesias@igalia.com>
This commit is contained in:
Kenneth Graunke 2015-06-23 23:57:31 -07:00
parent e22e0de0d7
commit 21b7c58b8a
1 changed files with 5 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -551,10 +551,12 @@ intel_renderbuffer_update_wrapper(struct brw_context *brw,
irb->mt_layer = layer_multiplier * layer;
if (layered) {
irb->layer_count = image->TexObject->NumLayers ?: mt->level[level].depth / layer_multiplier;
} else {
if (!layered) {
irb->layer_count = 1;
} else if (image->TexObject->NumLayers > 0) {
irb->layer_count = image->TexObject->NumLayers;
} else {
irb->layer_count = mt->level[level].depth / layer_multiplier;
}
intel_miptree_reference(&irb->mt, mt);